|
Bio-Rad
mca341ga Mca341ga, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/mca341ga/product/Bio-Rad Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mca341ga - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bio-Rad
elastin ab307150 ![]() Elastin Ab307150, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/elastin ab307150/product/Bio-Rad Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
elastin ab307150 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Proteintech
mouse anti cd68 plus rabbit anti cd163 ![]() Mouse Anti Cd68 Plus Rabbit Anti Cd163, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti cd68 plus rabbit anti cd163/product/Proteintech Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti cd68 plus rabbit anti cd163 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Cell Signaling Technology Inc
mouse anti cd68 plus rabbit anti hif 1α ![]() Mouse Anti Cd68 Plus Rabbit Anti Hif 1α, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti cd68 plus rabbit anti hif 1α/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti cd68 plus rabbit anti hif 1α - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
97/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Proteintech
mouse anti cd68 antibody ![]() Mouse Anti Cd68 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti cd68 antibody/product/Proteintech Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti cd68 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bio-Rad
rat monoclonal anti cd68 ![]() Rat Monoclonal Anti Cd68, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/rat monoclonal anti cd68/product/Bio-Rad Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat monoclonal anti cd68 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bio-Rad
rat anti cd68 ![]() Rat Anti Cd68, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/rat anti cd68/product/Bio-Rad Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti cd68 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bio-Rad
lysosomal phagocytic marker cd68 ![]() Lysosomal Phagocytic Marker Cd68, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/lysosomal phagocytic marker cd68/product/Bio-Rad Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lysosomal phagocytic marker cd68 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bio-Rad
perineuronal nets pnns ![]() Perineuronal Nets Pnns, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/perineuronal nets pnns/product/Bio-Rad Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
perineuronal nets pnns - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bio-Rad
anti cd68 ![]() Anti Cd68, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd68/product/Bio-Rad Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd68 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Bioactive Materials
Article Title: Apolipoprotein E knockout attenuates vascular graft fibrosis by reducing profibrotic macrophage formation through low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein 1
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.01.029
Figure Lengend Snippet: Involvement of profibrotic macrophages in vascular regeneration after graft implantation in vivo . (a) UMAP of macrophages in native aortas and regenerated aortas across different time points after graft implantation in vivo . (b) Dot plots of profibrotic macrophage marker genes (Ctsd, Spp1, Gpnmb, Lgals3, and Fabp5) expressed in different subgroups of macrophages. (c) Percentage of cluster 2 (C2) macrophages in native aortas and regenerated aortas across different time points after graft implantation in vivo . (d) UMAP of expression of Ctsd, Spp1, Gpnmb, Lgals3, and Fabp5 in macrophages in native aortas and regenerated aortas across different time points after graft implantation in vivo . (e) Immunofluorescence staining of CD68 and CTSD in regenerated aortas across different time points after graft implantation in vivo . L indicates lumens. Arrow heads indicate double positively stained cells. (f) WB results of levels of CTSD and SPP1 in native and regenerated aortas across different time points after graft implantation in vivo and quantification of the levels of CTSD and SPP1. ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01, Tukey's post-hoc test. For each time point and each group, five different samples from five different animals were analyzed (n = 5).
Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used in this study: APOE (Invitrogen, PA5-78803, 1:200 dilution), COL I (abcam, ab270993, 1:200 dilution), COL III (abcam, ab6310, 1:200 dilution), LUM (abcam, ab252925, 1:200 dilution), elastin (abcam, ab307150, ab307150, 1:200 dilution), eNOS (abcam, ab5589, 1:200 dilution), αSMA (abcam, ab7817, 1:200 dilution), Fibronectin (FN, abcam, ab268020, 1:200 dilution), CTSD (CST, 74089S, 1:200 dilution),
Techniques: In Vivo, Marker, Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Staining
Journal: Bioactive Materials
Article Title: Apolipoprotein E knockout attenuates vascular graft fibrosis by reducing profibrotic macrophage formation through low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein 1
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.01.029
Figure Lengend Snippet: APOE KO reducing profibrotic macrophage formation during vascular regeneration. (a) UMAP of macrophages in native aortas from WT and Apoe −/− rats, heatmap of C2 scores in the UMAP of macrophages in the native aortas, and percentage of C2 cells in macrophages in the native aortas. UMAP of macrophages in regenerated aortas after graft implantation in WT and Apoe −/− rats, heatmap of C2 scores in the UMAP of macrophages in the regenerated aortas, and percentage of C2 cells in macrophages in the regenerated aortas on Day 30 (b) and Day 90 (c). (d) Immunofluorescence staining of CD68 and CTSD in regenerated aortas 30 and 90 days after graft implantation in WT and Apoe−/− rats. (e) Quantification of CD68 and CTSD double positive cells in regenerated aortas on Day 30 and Day 90. ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01, Tukey's post-hoc test. For each time point and each group, five different images from five different samples were analyzed (n = 5). (f) WB results of APOE, CTSD and SPP1 levels in regenerated aortas after graft implantation in WT and Apoe −/− rats for 30 and 90 days. (g) Quantification of levels of APOE, CTSD and SPP1 in regenerated aortas on Day 30 and Day 90. ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01, Tukey's post-hoc test. For each time point and each group, five different samples from five different animals were analyzed (n = 5). (h) WB results of APOE, CTSD and SPP1 levels in WT and APOE KO macrophages after their culture on PCL scaffolds for 48 h. (i) Quantification of levels of APOE, CTSD and SPP1 in WT and APOE KO macrophages after their culture on PCL scaffolds for 48 h ∗ indicates p < 0.05, ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01, unpaired t -test. For each time point and each group, three different samples were analyzed (n = 3). (j) Immunofluorescence staining of APOE and CD68, CTSD and CD68, SPP1 and CD68, respectively, in WT and APOE KO macrophages after their culture on PCL scaffolds for 48 h.
Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used in this study: APOE (Invitrogen, PA5-78803, 1:200 dilution), COL I (abcam, ab270993, 1:200 dilution), COL III (abcam, ab6310, 1:200 dilution), LUM (abcam, ab252925, 1:200 dilution), elastin (abcam, ab307150, ab307150, 1:200 dilution), eNOS (abcam, ab5589, 1:200 dilution), αSMA (abcam, ab7817, 1:200 dilution), Fibronectin (FN, abcam, ab268020, 1:200 dilution), CTSD (CST, 74089S, 1:200 dilution),
Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining
Journal: Bioactive Materials
Article Title: Apolipoprotein E knockout attenuates vascular graft fibrosis by reducing profibrotic macrophage formation through low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein 1
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.01.029
Figure Lengend Snippet: APOE/LRP1 interaction promoting profibrotic macrophage formation during vascular regeneration after graft implantation in vivo . (a) Immunoprecipitation (IP) following mass spectrometry (MS) to screen potential receptors of APOE on surfaces of macrophages. (b) Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) to confirm interaction between APOE and LRP1. (c) Immunofluorescence staining of CD68 and LRP1 in regenerated aortas across different time points. (d) Immunofluorescence staining of APOE and LRP1 in WT macrophages 48 h after their culture on PCL scaffolds. (e) WB results of LRP1, APOE, CTSD and SPP1 levels in WT macrophages cultured on tissue culture plates (negative control, NC) or PCL scaffolds (PCL) for 48 h prior to treatment with shRNA ADV-shRNA(NC) or ADV-shRNA(Lrp1) for 24 h. Quantification of levels of LRP1 (f), APOE (g), CTSD (h) and SPP1 (i) in WT macrophages cultured on tissue culture plates or PCL scaffolds treated with shRNA ADV-shRNA(NC) or ADV-shRNA(Lrp1). ∗ indicates p < 0.05, ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01, N.S. indicates non-significant. Tukey's post-hoc test. For each group, three different samples were analyzed (n = 3). (j) Flow cytometry analysis of CTSD positive cells in WT macrophages cultured on tissue culture plates (negative control, NC) or PCL scaffolds (PCL) for 48 h prior to treatment with ADV-shRNA(NC) or ADV-shRNA(Lrp1) for 24 h and quantification of percentage of CTSD positive cells in WT macrophages in each group. ∗ indicates p < 0.05, Tukey's post-hoc test. For each group, three independent experiments were repeated, and results were analyzed (n = 3).
Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used in this study: APOE (Invitrogen, PA5-78803, 1:200 dilution), COL I (abcam, ab270993, 1:200 dilution), COL III (abcam, ab6310, 1:200 dilution), LUM (abcam, ab252925, 1:200 dilution), elastin (abcam, ab307150, ab307150, 1:200 dilution), eNOS (abcam, ab5589, 1:200 dilution), αSMA (abcam, ab7817, 1:200 dilution), Fibronectin (FN, abcam, ab268020, 1:200 dilution), CTSD (CST, 74089S, 1:200 dilution),
Techniques: In Vivo, Immunoprecipitation, Mass Spectrometry, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Cell Culture, Negative Control, shRNA, Flow Cytometry
Journal: Bioactive Materials
Article Title: Apolipoprotein E knockout attenuates vascular graft fibrosis by reducing profibrotic macrophage formation through low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein 1
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.01.029
Figure Lengend Snippet: Downregulation of APOE by AAV ameliorating fibrosis during vascular regeneration after graft implantation in vivo . (a) Illustration of a strategy of adventitial delivery of AAV-shRNA(Apoe) to inhibit APOE levels in regenerated aortas after graft implantation in vivo . Two weeks after graft implantation in vivo , AAV-shRNA(Apoe) were injected into the adventitia of the regenerated aortas, which were then harvested for analysis three weeks later. (b) M mode images of ultrasound detection of regenerated aortas treated with PBS, AAV-shRNA(NC), and AAV-shRNA(Apoe) for 3 weeks. Arrow heads indicate movement of vascular walls. (c) Tensile tests of regenerated aortas treated with PBS, AAV-shRNA(NC), and AAV-shRNA(Apoe) for 3 weeks. (d) Quantification of RI, PI, and compliance of regenerated aortas treated with PBS, AAV-shRNA(NC), and AAV-shRNA(Apoe) for 3 weeks. ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01, Tukey's post-hoc test. For each group, six different images from six different animals were analyzed (n = 6). (e) Quantification of elastic modulus of regenerated aortas treated with PBS, AAV-shRNA(NC), and AAV-shRNA(Apoe) for 3 weeks. ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01, Tukey's post-hoc test. For each group, six different images from six different animals were analyzed (n = 6). (f) H&E, MTC and EVG staining of regenerated aortas treated with PBS, AAV-shRNA(NC), and AAV-shRNA(Apoe) for 3 weeks. (g) Immunofluorescence staining of COL I, COL III, elastin, αSMA, and eNOS in regenerated aortas treated with PBS, AAV-shRNA(NC), and AAV-shRNA(Apoe) for 3 weeks. L indicates lumens. Arrow heads indicate capillaries. Quantification of adventitia thickness (h), collagen positive areas according to MTC staining (i), elastin positive areas according to EVG staining (j), COL I positive areas (k), COL III positive areas (l), and number of capillaries (m) in adventitial areas of regenerated aortas. (n) Immunofluorescence staining of CTSD and CD68 in regenerated aortas treated with PBS, AAV-shRNA(NC), and AAV-shRNA(Apoe) for 3 weeks. (o) CD68 and CTSD double positive cells in regenerated aortas. ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01, Tukey's post-hoc test. For each group, six different samples from six different animals were analyzed (n = 6). (p) WB results of APOE, CTSD and SPP1 levels in regenerated aortas treated with PBS, AAV-shRNA(NC), and AAV-shRNA(Apoe) for 3 weeks and quantification of levels of APOE, CTSD and SPP1 in regenerated aortas. ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01, Tukey's post-hoc test. For each group, six different samples from six different animals were analyzed (n = 6). (q) Quantification of IGF-1 concentrations in regenerated aortas treated with PBS, AAV-shRNA(NC), and AAV-shRNA(Apoe) for 3 weeks by ELISA. ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01, Tukey's post-hoc test. For each group, six different samples from six different animals were analyzed (n = 3).
Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used in this study: APOE (Invitrogen, PA5-78803, 1:200 dilution), COL I (abcam, ab270993, 1:200 dilution), COL III (abcam, ab6310, 1:200 dilution), LUM (abcam, ab252925, 1:200 dilution), elastin (abcam, ab307150, ab307150, 1:200 dilution), eNOS (abcam, ab5589, 1:200 dilution), αSMA (abcam, ab7817, 1:200 dilution), Fibronectin (FN, abcam, ab268020, 1:200 dilution), CTSD (CST, 74089S, 1:200 dilution),
Techniques: In Vivo, shRNA, Injection, Staining, Immunofluorescence, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Journal: Journal of Advanced Research
Article Title: CCR1 hi /CCL5 hi macrophage-mediated CCL5 hi T cell chemotaxis in salivary gland aggravates Sjögren’s syndrome
doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2025.06.076
Figure Lengend Snippet: CCR1-overexpressing macrophages induce T and B cell migration. (A) Immunofluorescence (IF) detection of CD68 expression in THP-1 cells induced by PMA (100 nM, 24 h). (B) Quantitative analysis of CD68 expression based on IF staining fluorescence intensity. (C) Schematic diagram of the detection of macrophage-induced T and B cell migration. (D, E) Western blot analysis and quantitative evaluation of CCR1 and CCL5 expression in macrophages after transfection with the CCR1 overexpression plasmid. (F) ELISA measurement of CCL5 concentration in supernatants from CCR1-overexpressing macrophages. (G, H) Transwell assay evaluating macrophage-mediated migration of T and B cells, with quantitative analysis of migrated cell numbers. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA.
Article Snippet: To induce differentiation into macrophages, THP-1 cells were treated with 100 nM PMA for 24 h. Differentiation was confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis of CD68 localization and expression using a
Techniques: Migration, Immunofluorescence, Expressing, Staining, Fluorescence, Western Blot, Transfection, Over Expression, Plasmid Preparation, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Concentration Assay, Transwell Assay
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Glial cell and perineuronal net interactions in the dorsal striatum of aged mice
doi: 10.64898/2026.03.25.714174
Figure Lengend Snippet: A Quantification of Iba1 + cell counts for the total striatum. Data was normalized to area. B. Quantification of Iba1 + intensity per Iba1 + cell. C. Quantification of CD68 + intensity per Iba1 + cell D. Quantification of WFA + intensity per Iba1 + cell. E. Linear regression analysis of Ibal + intensity versus CD68 + intensity per cell. F. Linear regression analysis of Ibal + intensity versus UTA + intensity per cell. G. Linear regression analysis of CD68 + intensity versus UTA + intensity per cell. A Data represented as mean ± SENL data was tested for normality prior to statistical analysis. Two-tailed t-tests or Welch’s t-test used when appropriate. Regression analysis: R 2 values of corresponding linear regressions label on graph and t-test comparison of slopes used, p-values: * <0.05, * * <0.01. N - 4-5 mice/group, 3-5 sections/mouse, 13-41 cells/mouse.
Article Snippet: Coronal 30-μm hemisections containing the dorsal striatum were processed in two independent staining/imaging cohorts: ( ) microglia were labeled with Iba1 (rabbit; FUJIFILM Wako, #P3088) in combination with the
Techniques: Two Tailed Test, Comparison